Back to search

SAMKUL-Samfunnsutviklingens kulturell

What should not be bought and sold?

Alternative title: Hva bør man ikke kunne kjøpe og selge?

Awarded: NOK 9.0 mill.

Project Number:

259521

Application Type:

Project Period:

2016 - 2022

Location:

Subject Fields:

Partner countries:

While most of us have no objections to things such as pets, books, and childcare being bought and sold, many feel uncomfortable when it comes to pregnancies and sexual services. When we consider the buying and selling of friendships, babies, human organs, and political votes, the vast majority would say that a line has been crossed. But where do we draw the line? And how do we determine that? This project has worked on these types of questions, in a collaboration between UiO, Yale, and Oxford, for four years, and has developed from focusing on particular to more general ethical problems related to commodification. This has generated publications in leading international journals including Bioethics, Journal of Medical Ethics, American Journal of Bioethics, Journal of Applied Philosophy, and Philosophical Studies. The PhD student has completed their project and now leads an RCN Mobility grant. The present project is continued by the PI in a 50% stilling. The frequency of research communication in national media remains high. The research focus in the last part of the project period is on how structural power asymmetries can invalidate consent in transactions.

-

While most of us have no objections to things such as pets, books, and childcare being bought and sold, many feel uncomfortable when it comes to pregnancies and sexual services. When we consider the buying and selling of friendships, babies, human organs, and political votes, the vast majority would say that a line has been crossed. But where do we draw the line? And how do we determine that? Those are pressing ethical questions, for how we understand and delimit markets has a profound impact on society, and as technological development advances, more and more things become potential commodities. This project will contribute to the development of ethical criteria for what should, and what should not, be treated as commodities. The first aim of the project is to systematize and make accessible the ethical commodification debate, which is currently fragmented. A further aim is to identify and correct three recurring conflations in influential commodification arguments. These are conflations between objections to: (a) people trading item A and people having item A, (b) people trading item A and people trading item A under certain conditions, (c) people trading item A and what causes people to trade item A. On the basis of this, three central lessons will be drawn. One lesson is that the proper scope of commodification is independent of the proper scope of distributive justice. Two other lessons involve the identification of a new informal fallacy in applied ethics (The Bulldozing Fallacy) and a new phenomenon in moral psychology (Moral Mist). The final aim of the project is to draw lessons from the commodification debate to the methods of applied ethics more broadly. In doing so, this project will move the frontiers of commodification ethics, one of the areas of philosophy that are most urgently relevant to public policy.

Publications from Cristin

No publications found

Funding scheme:

SAMKUL-Samfunnsutviklingens kulturell